Nascar’s Real Problems And Solutions, Part 1

Before we go any further here, I want to congratulate Kevin Harvick and all the rest of Richard Childress racing for a well-earned 2010 Sprint Cup Championship. As we all know, Harvick beat Jimmy Johnson by 285 points, talking the title from Jimmy Johnson, who won his second championship last year…oh wait, none of it happened that way, did it?? That’s right, thanks to Nascar’s obsessive tinkering, JJ has won his 5th in a row. And for all of the sanctioning body’s gyrations and the breathless hype from their talking head sycophants they still could not match what would have happened using the old point system in 2006, when Jimmy Johnson would have beaten Matt Kenseth by a whopping 4, that’s right, 4 points. In 2008, again with the old system, Carl Edwards would have beaten the intrepid JJ by a mere 16 points. The point is that there would have been some very compelling and memorable point battles (albeit all of them including the currently unbeatable #48) without attempting to force the sport to mimic stick and ball sports with some form of ‘post season.’

In Nascar’s defense, they are in a bit of a predicament, some of it is their own doing, some of it is the world they live in. In becoming the dominant racing sanctioning body in the country and one of the most important in the world, Nascar has also become a huge monster that requires tens of millions of dollars a year to feed itself. The revenue the tracks generate through traditional ticket sales, concession stands, etc, can’t even begin to pay today’s purses, after the track overheads are taken out. The sport would wither and die without the millions generated from television, plain and simple. And, what is also plain and simple is…that torrent of revenue is directly related to how many people, especially in that holy grail of the 18-35 demographics, are watching.

Nascars Real Problems And Solutions, Part 2: The Solutions

It’s easy to criticize, all you need to do is turn on talk radio, or read a blog or two for that matter. Like many others, I have also criticized the country’s largest and most important racing sanctioning body, Nascar. Having said that, unlike many, I have some possible solutions to some of the most onerous bones of contention that seem to be sticking in some folks throats, as well as some thoughts as to how Nascar could both improve the races in ways that both the fan and the racer would appreciate. Last column I said I would address some, so without further ado:

About those double file restarts…”shootout style”. Mercifully Larry McReynolds and the gang stopped using that horrifyingly hackneyed phrase fairly early after Nascar, in a blatant attempt to “liven up” its races, decided that the cars needed to be bunched up on a steady basis. Nascar has gotten it into their collective heads that its racing should be “Days of Thunder” all day, all the time. Apparently the powers that be think that what the couch potatoes want to see is crashing cars. But that system, as it is currently used now, is part of Nascar’s problem. Because if crashing its stars was what people really wanted to see, the attendance and the TV audience would have taken a jump up, because wrecking the field on a regular basis has now become business as usual. My personal take on this is two-fold, that’s exactly what the modern ‘ fan’, and I truly am taking liberty with the term ‘fan’, wants to see. But, that is balanced out with the many real fans of the sport who frankly are sick of Nascar’s tinkering and tune out many races nowadays. Besides the fact that track promoters across the country are aping big brother with this nonsense, thereby decimating their already economically battered car counts. This may not be a huge problem area, but issues do exist with it that need to be addressed. Here is a workable solution.